Thursday, July 31, 2008

Women either wear bags or be disfigured with acid - where's the "moderate" leadership? Plotting dirty tricks on the airliners?

Lovely Islam: Taliban threatens to disfigure un-veiled women with acid
Taliban warn ‘un-Islamic’ businesses of dire consequences

* Group sets 15-day deadline for CD shops, cafes to close down
* Says women to wear hijab or be ready to get burnt with acid

LAHORE: Tehreek-e-Islami Taliban Pakistan (TITP) has distributed a fifteen-days notice to several “un-Islamic” businesses in Kot Addu to shut down or face dire consequences.

The TTIP wrote threatening letters to owners of CDs shops, Internet cafes and cable service providers urging them to close down their activities. (OR BE MURDERED)

Similarly, the group warned that women must wear hijab to ensure their safety.

More proof that a ban on all religious headdress will have a far more powerful effect than most realize

The headscarf is key to the brutal subjugation of women all over the muslim world.

"Mother forbidden to wear bikini in play park" (IN FINLAND, NO LESS)

A Helsinki mother was taking in the sun in the Tapuli residential park in Tapaninkylä with her two sons, ages 5 and 6. While the boys were splashing in the swimming pool the mother decided to get some sun. She spread her blanket on the grass by the pool, so she could keep an eye on the children.

The mother managed to lay only for a second, when the park's staff, a woman, came over and admonished her to dress up. According to the woman an adult is not allowed to be in the park in a bikini.

Why can't someone get a tan in a play park, director in charge of parks, Leena Timonen?

"During the play parks Summer operations all children wear swim wear. It has been agreed about adults, that the staff observe that their dress is also appropriate. Bikinis are not explicitly forbidden, but a bare upper body and string bikinis are observed for moderation. Every staff member interprits for themself, what is appropriate."

Who has created the rules?

"This was jointly done between the play park-staff and family-center directors, that all parks would follow the same rules. We have a lot immigrants, for which too much revealing clothing would offend. But not one rule was made because of them."

How often do you have to give notices to under dressed parents?

"I have not heard any situation like this before. Mostly it's giving notice to those who have gone into the pool with clothes on."

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Israel is the sacred, historical land of Christians and Jews, not of the usurpers

Jerusalem is the historical city of Christians and Jews

Why do Muslims insist that Jerusalem is their Holy City?

When Mohamed and his faithful followers moved from Mecca to Medina, they found themselves among three Jewish tribes/clans (BANU-L-NADIR, BANU KAINUKA and BANU KURAIZA) which settled there some time after their expulsion from their homeland and also living there were two Arab, pagan tribes.

Mohammed, who at this stage needed more followers, decided to win those tribes over and convert them to his newly invented religion.

Islam was yet not as fully developed as we know it today, and Mohammed was still having his sessions with Allah (the Medina period revelations).

To attract the Jews and to convince them that Islam was also their true religion and he was a true prophet, Mohammad ordered his companions to pray while facing the same direction as the Jews as well as to observe the same time for fasting.

Saheeh Bukhari - 2004, Narrated Ibn Abbas: When the Prophet (SAW) came to Al-Madinah and saw the Jews fasting the day of Ashoora' [Passover], he said, "What is this [day]?"
They replied, "This is the day which God saved the children of Israel from their enemy , thus Moses fasted it."
He said, "I have more right to Moses than you."
So he fasted it and ordered fasting it.

Mohammad and his companions continued to pray for 19 months offering the quibla (direction of prayers) imitating the local Jews ( facing Jerusalem) but the recalcitrant Jews rejected Mohammad’s invitation to become his followers.

Musnad Ahmad - 23464, Narrated Awf bin Malik: The Prophet (SAW) and I with him went one day until we entered a Jewish Synagogue in Al-Madinah on a holiday of theirs. They hated our entrance on them. So the Messenger of Allah (SAW) said, "O ye Jews, show me twelve men [among the Jews] who believe that there is no God but Allah and that Mohammad is his messenger, and Allah will spare all the Jews under heaven his wrath the wrath he has."
They [the Jews] silenced everyone and no one answered him. So he repeated what he said and no one answered. So he repeated it for the third time and no one answered. So he said,
"You refuse! By Allah, I am the last [Prophet] and I am the final [Prophet] and I am the chosen Prophet; whether you believe or not."

Mohammad then decided to deal with the Jews in a much more decisive way and ordered the direction of prayers back towards Mecca (the traditional pagan way).

Submission of Banu Nadir to the Muslim troops (14-century painting)

Saheeh Muslim - 1765, Narrated Abi Hurayrah: While we were at the Mosque, the Messenger of Allah (SAW) came to us and said, "Go to the Jews."
So we went out with him until we arrived. So the Messenger of Allah (SAW) stood up and called on them, "O ye Jewish people, become Muslims and you will be safe."
They replied, "You have delivered [your message] O Aba Al-Qasim [Mohammad's Kunyah (title)]."
So he said to them, "That [delivering the message] is what I want. Become Muslims and you will be safe."
They replied, "You have delivered [your message] O Aba Al-Qasim [Mohammad's Kunyah (title)]."
So he repeated what he said for the third time and said, "Know that the land is for Allah and his Messenger, and I want to exile you from this land. So let him he who finds something valuable in his possession sell it; or know that the land is for Allah and his Messenger."

Qur'an-2:144 We have seen the turning of thy face to heaven (for guidance, O Muhammad). And now verily We shall make thee turn (in prayer) toward a qiblah which is dear to thee. So turn thy face toward the Inviolable Place of Worship, and ye (O Muslims), wheresoever ye may be, turn your faces (when ye pray) toward it. Lo! Those who have received the Scripture know that (this revelation) is the Truth from their Lord. And Allah is not unaware of what they do.

At this stage Mohammad forgot all about the Jewish holy place and neither its description nor its name is mentioned in the whole Qur’an even once.

Mohamed now devoted his time to killing and driving out all infidels from the peninsula.

Battle of Khayba. Hazrat Ali slays Jewish leader Marhab.
Saheeh Muslim - 1767, Narrated Omar bin Al-Khattab: He [Omar] heard the Messenger of Allah (SAW) saying, "O I indeed will exile the Jews and the Christians from the Arabian Peninsula until I leave no one but a Muslim."

There were no more attempts (no revelations) trying to incorporate Judaism and Christianity into Islam and the Jews and Christians were condemned by Allah to be what they are now – descendants of apes and pigs, who must either submit to Islam or become dhimmis.

Qur'an-9:29 Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low. Fight against Christians and Jews “until they pay the tribute (the Dhimmi) readily, being brought low.”

After Muhammad’s death, the Muslims armies under Khaliph Umar captured Jerusalem in 638, but there were no historical references/sources left which would mention any Muslim claims as to whether Jerusalem was a holy Islamic place (neither Muslim nor Christian).

The Jerusalem (as a Muslims holy place) issue was born some 50 years after the prophet’s death in 682 when Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr rebelled against the second Umayyad khaliph, Yazid B. Muawiya and after taking Mecca prevented pilgrims from fulfilling the Hajj.

Yazid’s successor Khalif Abd al-Malik needed an alternative place for the pilgrimage and decided upon Jerusalem which by then was under his control.

To convince the pilgrims that the new place was as good as Mecca Abd al-Malik used some creative "theology" and re-discovered that the prophet had traveled to some place called the Remote Mosque (Al-Aqsa), during his extravagant night-voyage into heaven in A.D. 619.

AL-Aqsa mosque was indeed mentioned in the Qur'an:

Qur'an-17.1 Glory be to Him Who made His servant to go on a night from the Sacred Mosque to the Remote Mosque of which We have blessed the precincts, so that We may show to him some of Our signs; surely He is the Hearing, the Seeing.

And so the Remote or Furtherest Mosque was “rediscovered” as the sacred Temple in Jerusalem.

There was only one problem. Muhammad could not see any great temple in Jerusalem during his mystic journey with Angel Gabriel because the last Jewish temple was destroyed in 70 A.D. by the Roman Emperor Titus (some 500 years before Muhammad’s alleged birth).

Somehow though, such trivia as facts and history had never seemed to bother Islamic scholars and theologians.

To support the new Khaliph’s Quranic discovery, a new Temple, which became the Dome of Rock (Qubbat al-Sakhra) and later the Remote Mosque ( al-Aksa Mosque ) were conveniently built.

Al Malik did not succeed though in convincing his fellow Muslims about the sanctity of Jerusalem and so they continued to direct their “quibla” towards Mecca and the pagan Kabaa as they always had even before the invention of Islam.

In fact the contemporary Arabs knew that the Remote Mosque (al-Aksa) had always been near Mecca on the Arabian Peninsula. This is stated in Kitab al-Maghazi by a historian and geographer al-Waqidi (d.822 A.D.)According to him there were two places of prayer in al-Gi’ranah, a village between Mecca and Ta’if, one was “the closer mosque” (al-masjid al-adana) and the other was “the remote mosque” (al-masjid al-aqsa).

And so the “holiness of Jerusalem” was abandoned for many years until Saladin (1138-1193) found the revival of al-masjid al-aqsa myth useful to inspire fighting spirit among the Muslims against the Crusaders.

After the crusaders were driven away, for over seven hundred years Jerusalem remained still a predominately Christian city and the “Muslim “Holy Temples” collected cobwebs and never attracted much devotion from the followers of Allah.

Jerusalem itself (as well as so called Palestine) lost its significance and became a provincial city with a dying economy.

The Arch of Titus and the details depicting the spoils from the destroyed Second Jewish Temple, the temple which according to Yassir Arafat had never existed (contradicting al-Malik)

Most of the inhabitants suffered poverty and hardship as the surrounding area from the beginning of the Muslim conquest became an object of frequent plunder of predatory Bedouin tribes and various factions of Islamic invaders.

The Jihad against the Jewish and Christian inhabitants of Jerusalem and Palestine was relentless and it came in bursts of devastating hostilities.

(E.g. in 937 A.D.):

The Muslims attacked . . . in Jerusalem on Palm Sunday (26 March 937) and set fire to the southern gates of Constantine’s church and to half of the exedra, whereupon the Church of the Calvary and the Church of the Resurrection collapsed. . . . According to al-Makin and al-Maqrizi, the Church of the Resurrection and the Church of the Calvary were also robbed of their treasures. . . . It seems at the same time the Muslims attacked in Ascalon again. According to Yahya b. Sa’id, the assault was made on “the great church there, known by the name of Mary the Green. They destroyed it and robbed it of all its contents and then set fire to it.’ . . . The bishop of Ascalon then left for Baghdad to get permission to rebuild the church, but he did not succeed. The church was left in ruins, for the Muslims who lived in Ascalon agreed amongst themselves that they would not allow it to be built again. As to the bishop, he never returned to Ascalon and remained in Ramla until his death. (Gil, History of Palestine quoted from -A. Bostom, The Legacy of Jihad, p.48)

During so called periods of relative “peace” the inhabitants of Jerusalem as well as the whole Palestine were exposed to apartheid, humiliation and intolerance:

Neglected Dome of the Rock in a state of disrepair ca 1875
(Reported in 1011) - They were ordered to wear black turbans. The Christians had to wear a cross the length of a cubit and weighing five ratls around the necks: the Jews were obliged to wear a block of wood of similar weight …... they had to wear some distinguishing mark in the bath—houses, and finally al—Hakim decided that there were to be separate bath-houses for their use, . . . Ibn Al—Athir conveys ... that al-Hakim ordered (after the destruction of the Church of the Resurrection in Jerusalem... ) that all the churches in the realm be destroyed, and this was done, and that the Jews and Christians were then to accept Islam, or emigrate to Byzantine lands. They were also obliged to wear special distinguishing signs. Many converted… Bar Hebraeus speaks of thousands of churches which were destroyed in the Fatimid kingdom at that time; the decree regarding the wearing ii the cross around the neck was also, he says, a means of pressuring the Christians to convert. The wooden block the Jews were obliged to wear, had to be in a shape of a calf, as a reminder of the golden calf. (Gil, History of Palestine quoted from -A. Bostom, The Legacy of Jihad, p.48-49)
The Turcoman period just before the crusades (1071-1099) was known among the inhabitants of Palestine as the “End of Days”:

Then Atsiz advanced on Jerusalem from Damascus, placed the city under siege, and promised its inhabitants the aman; on this basis, the inhabitants opened the gates of the city to him. Atsiz prevailed over Jerusalem, completely ignoring his promise of aman, and went on rampage. He slaughtered 3,000 people there….
He also conducted campaigns of annihilation against Ramla, until all its people had fled, against Gaza, where he murdered the entire population. He likewise massacred people in al-Arish and elsewhere and wrought endless havoc in Damascus, where only 3,000 of the original 500,000 had remained, due to starvation and and scarcity. Jaffa too was attacked, and its governor … fled from the town to Tyre, together with all the city’s inhabitants, while the walls of Jaffa were destroyed on Atsis orders. (cited in Andrew, G. Bostom, The Legacy of Jihad,

Despite the most vigorous Islamic attempts to convince gullible Westerners that the Muslim invasion of Palestine was in fact the liberation of “Arabs from Byzantine oppression”, the historical sources speak up loud and clear about the centuries of Muslim, rape, pillage, genocide and forced conversions of Christians and Jews.

The quotation below is a contemporary poem by Solomon ha-Kohen b. Joseph, from a family of Palestinian Jewish eligious leaders ca: 1070):

They were a strange and cruel people, girt with garments of many colors,
Armed and officered-chiefs araong ‘the terrible ones’
And capped with helmets, black and red,
With bow and spear and full quivers;
And they trumpet like elephants, and roar as the roaring ocean,
To terrify, to frighten those who oppose them,
And they are wicked men and sinners, madmen, not sane,
And they laid waste the cities, and they were made desolate
And they rejoiced in their hearts, hoping to inherit.
He [God) also remembered what they had done to the people of Jerusalem,
That they had besieged them twice in two years,
And burned the heaped corn and destroyed the places,
And cut down the trees and tranwled upon the vineyards,
And surrounded the city upon the high mountains,
And despoiled the graves and threw out the bones,
And built palaces, to protect themselves against the heat,
And erected an altar to slay upon it the abominations;
And the men and women ride upon the walls
Crying onto the God of gods, to quiet the great anger,
Standing the whole night, banishing sleep
While the enemy destroy, evening and morning,
And break down the whole earth, and lay bare the ground,
And stand the highways, intending to slay like Cain,
And cut off the ears, and also the nose,
And rob the garments, leaving them stand naked,
And also roar like lions, and roar like young lions;
They do not resemble men, they are like beasts,
And also harlots and adulterers, and they inflame themselves with males,
They are bad and wicked and spiteful as Sodomites.
And they impoverished the sons of nobles, and starved the delicately bred.
And all the people of the city went out and cried in the field,
Anti covered their lips, silent in their pains,
Anti they had no mercy on widows, and pitied not the orphans.
(J. Greenstone's translation quoted from -A. Bostom, The Legacy of Jihad, p.50-51)

Farming, the life support system, virtually ceased and was replaced by the nomadic Bedouin herdsmen adding even further to the total deprivation of the agricultural land.

At the eve of the "final solution" to the "Jewish Problem",
the Mufti and Adolf Hitler confer
in Berlin, November 21, 1941

When Mark Twain visited Palestine in 1867 he was surprised to find the holy city of Jerusalem dirty, impoverished and neglected:

A FAST walker could go outside the walls of Jerusalem and walk entirely around the city in an hour. I do not know how else to make one understand how small it is…..
The population of Jerusalem is composed of Moslems, Jews, Greeks, Latins, Armenians, Syrians, Copts, Abyssinians, Greek Catholics, and a handful of Protestants. One hundred of the latter sect are all that dwell now in this birthplace of christianity. The nice shades of nationality comprised in the above list, and the languages spoken by them, are altogether too numerous to mention. It seems to me that all the races and colors and tongues of the earth must be represented among the fourteen thousand souls that dwell in Jerusalem. Rags, wretchedness, poverty and dirt, those signs and symbols that indicate the presence of Moslem rule more surely than the crescent-flag itself, abound. Lepers, cripples, the blind, and the idiotic, assail you on every hand, and they know but one word of but one language apparently -- the eternal "bucksheesh." To see the numbers of maimed, malformed and diseased humanity that throng the holy places and obstruct the gates, one might suppose that the ancient days had come again, and that the angel of the was expected to descend at any moment to stir the waters of Bethesda. Jerusalem is mournful, and dreary, and lifeless. I would not desire to live here. (source)

The final chapter however of the saga was created by the Grand Mufti Haj Amin al Husseini who revived the myth of Jerusalem as the third holiest Muslim City in order to oppose the resurrection of Israel.

Since Arab nationalism was non-existent (the idea of a state as understood by the West is totally alien to Islamic culture) he reinvented the Islamic holiness of Jerusalem to stir the local Muslim Arabs into violent jihad against the Jews.

And so as soon as Herbert Samuel appointed him to the position of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Husseini started his propaganda to raise Jerusalem’s status as an Islamic holy city. One of his first projects was to refurbish the decaying Temple of the Rock and al Aqsa mosque.

His disciple and replacement - Arafat continued this Holy Islamic Farce.

Of course the ordinary, brainwashed Muslims will always do what they are told by their leaders and imams but why should the West repeat the same errors again and again by allowing murderous political systems like the Nazis or Islam to exist and expand?

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Muslims butcher a TEACHER (of girls) in front of his own children. Where's the "moderate" muslim leaders? Whining and sniveling about islamophobia?

Indonesia: AP Exclusive: Officials Say Militants Killed Christian, Planned To Assassinate American

JAKARTA, INDONESIA: Indonesian terror suspects executed a Christian teacher in front of his family and were planning to assassinate an American language teacher before their arrest this month, a top anti-terrorism official and the suspects' lawyer said Monday (28 July).

The ten alleged militants have also told officers they were plotting to attack the Supreme Court to avenge the upcoming executions of the Bali nightclub bombers and attack a joint Singaporean-Indonesian military exercise, the security official said.

The revelations point to the resilience of Islamist militant networks in Indonesia despite a U.S.-backed crackdown that has netted more than 400 suspects in recent years and reduced the risk of more large-scale attacks on Western targets, most experts say.

Since 11 Sept 2001, Indonesia has been hit by a string of suicide bombings blamed on members and associates of the regional militant group Jemaah Islamiyah, including the 2002 nightclub bombings on Bali island that left 202 people dead, many of them foreign tourists. The last major strike was in 2005, also on Bali.

The group of 10 militants were arrested in early July in a series of raids on Sumatra island. Officers have said one of the suspects was a Singaporean who trained in Afghanistan with al-Qaida. Twenty bombs packed with live bullets were seized from the men.

The men's lawyer Asludin Hatjani said Monday the group was responsible for shooting 59-year-old Dago Simamora, an Indonesian teacher, to death in front of his children last year in the south Sumatran town of Pekanbaru.


Monday, July 28, 2008

Tomorrow's sociopathic killers being brainwashed as we speak - They will be killing our children and grandchildren and still blaming the jews

Pictured: The TV rabbit preaching hatred and telling young Muslims to 'kill and eat Jews'

An Islamic TV station using a Bugs Bunny lookalike to preach hatred to children has been slammed by religious leaders in the UK who fear it could brainwash vulnerable British children.

Assud the rabbit, who vows to 'kill and eat Jews' and glorifies the maiming of 'infidels' appears on Palestinian children's show, Tomorrow's Pioneers.

The rabbit is a number of characters who is punished by viewer's vote when he breaches Sharia law.

In one episode, Assud admits stealing money and is seen begging for mercy after young viewers and parents phone in demanding his hands are cut off as punishment.

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Where's the moderate leadership from the belief system that creates the worst societies on earth

Terrorists Support Girls Education by Blowing up Girl's School

As Pakistan hands over swaths of territory to terrorists the terrorists are busy implementing an islamic Utopia. Dawn

MINGORA, July 25: A girls’ school and 13 shops were blown up in a fresh wave of bombings in Swat on Friday.

Local people said an explosive device damaged the Government Girls’ High School in Totano Bandai area in Kabal tehsil.

The bomb destroyed 10 classrooms and two staff offices.

The horror that muslim women must be going through is unimaginable - TIME TO BAN THE HEADSCARF IN SCHOOLS WORKPLACE ETC.


Islam: He fracturing his nose, because she lifted her veil

A man who had struck his wife with fists, fracturing his nose, because she retroussé her Islamic veil because of the heat was sentenced Friday to two years in prison with 18 months suspended by the court Correctional Marseilles.

Friday, July 25, 2008

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has declared 5 August an annual international Islamic human rights day

Iran: August 5 will be "Islamic Human Rights Day"

Iran's Supreme Cultural Revolution Council headed by hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has declared 5 August an annual international Islamic human rights day.
The conservative-dominated council also nominated 12 July as an annual 'National Virtue Day for the Veil'.

How-to seminars on wife beating

How-to seminars on daughter murdering

How-to seminars on castrating of tiny girls

How-to seminars on stoning women who talk to a male non-relative

How-to seminars on how to get away with slavery by shifting blame onto the jews

Absolutely NO SEX unless you're dead except for raping non-covered women

How-to seminars on how to play dirty tricks on the airliners, then sue for big bucks

Muslim girls fleeing honor murdering dad in SWEDEN? What kind of cowards are the muslim leaders? Busy plotting dirty tricks on airliners?

Sweden: Honor-related violence

ÖP reported this spring about Henrik and Anna. These are not their real names and their personal details are kept under wraps. Anna's father is a Muslim and Anna and Henrik have lodged complaints by the police that he had threatened to kill them since Anne married Henrik, who isn't a Muslim.

They have also complained by the police that an unknown people have broken into their apartment in Östersund and threatened them. People who have certainly been sent by the father.

They hope therefore to leave the county.

Anna says that now they're just waiting for information from a municipality in another part of the country.

The municipal housing company had offered a modern and well-planned apartment in close proximity to the local police station.

Anna says that they can be completely safe, the risk that they will be threatened there seems unbelievably small and they would be able to build up their life from scratch.

As in the past, the economy can mess up the situation for the couple, since they don't have a job. Without a job the housing company doubts if they can pay the rent, which means it depends on whether the welfare authorities can pay the rent at first till the couple gets a steady income.

Henrik says that it's important for them how Östersund and the new community act. As long as the couple worry about threats it's also difficult to work, but he's certain that once they know that the situation is stable, it will also be alright with work.

The question is therefore if the new municipality is can pay their rent and living expenses for the initial period - and if Östersund municipality can help with the move.

Anna says that right now they're just waiting and all the people in charge are on holiday. She'd asked her welfare officer for help with contacting the new community, but that didn't happen. But, she says, they continue to hope, and it would be so nice to be free of fear.

Thursday, July 24, 2008

The master-slave relationship that exists between men and women in Islam is something that should not be introduced into America. Islam has been

The only way islam has led in any way is in enslaving and castrating women and enslaving and castrating black males and just about anyone they can enslave.

Where is the "moderate" muslim leadership? Plotting dirty tricks to play on our airliners?

A parade of slaves in islam

The master-slave relationship that exists between men and women in Islam is something that should not be introduced into America. Sure, sure, it is already here and the politically correct, culturally neutered media long ago determined not to talk about it, it would be an embarrassment to America’s latest protected species.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Where's the "moderate" muslim leadership? Playing dirty tricks on our airplanes and then suing our airliners out of existence?

Pakistan Clerics Threaten To Kill Christian For Marrying Muslim; Christian Girls Kidnapped

Members of Pakistan's tiny Christian minority join Easter prayers at a church in Karachi. Via BBC News ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN (BosNewsLife)-- A Christian man was hiding Thursday, July 17, after Muslim clerics in Pakistan's Punjab province threatened to kill him for marrying a Muslim woman, while two Christian girls in the same region were forced to marry their Muslim kidnappers, rights investigators and local Christians said.

Asim Pasha, a Christian resident of the city of Attock, reportedly married Samina in 2004, despite objections from her parents. "Samina’s Muslim parents opposed the marriage due to Pasha’s Christian faith. That's why the couple fled the city and remained in hiding to protect themselves from Samina’s parents," said US-based rights group International Christian Concern (ICC) with Website

The couple apparently returned to Attock in 2007 with a child and Pasha started a music business in his neighborhood. Soon after, local Muslim clerics reportedly claimed that Pasha had turned to Islam only to eventually force Samina to convert to Christianity.

They said he had "cheated a Muslim girl and made fun of Islam,” and therefore “must be hanged publicly," ICC reported.


Pasha has denied their charges. He has asked authorities to protect him and a human rights organization is providing him with a hiding place, ICC said. "Pasha is ready for exile along with his wife and child. He said he wants to live happily with his family without fear of disputes. This is not currently possible for him as the local police have refused to register a case against the clerics" or a news paper who made false allegations about him, ICC added.

News of Pasha's troubles, come as a Pakistani couple has appealed a court decision to award custody of their two daughters, 10 and 13, to the children’s alleged kidnappers. The court based its custody decision on the girls’ alleged conversion to Islam. Judge Main Naeem Sardar ruled Saturday, July 12, that Saba Masih, 13, and Aneela Masih, 10, had become Muslims, invalidating their Christian parents’ right to legal guardianship.

Under a common interpretation of Islamic law, a Christian cannot have custody of a Muslim. The sisters appeared in a Muzaffargarh District and Sessions court in the company of 16 Muslim men and were given five minutes to testify that their conversion was genuine, human rights activist Ashfaq Fateh told reporters.


It was the first time that Younis Masih and his wife had seen their daughters since they disappeared on June 26 while traveling to their uncle’s nearby home in Sarwar Shaheed, 150 miles (240 kilometers) southwest of Lahore, trial observers said.

The chairman of advocacy group Rays Of Development (ROD, Ferhan Mazher, told BosNewsLife that the reported kidnapping underscored the need of police and government officials to "take notice of the lamentable episode and rescue the girls from the hard line Islamic elements," who he claimed could eventually even “kill the Christian girls.”

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Why antisemitism is NEVER EVER about jews or Israel - it's about political power, control and demagoguing the sheeple

Long, brilliant article that clearly shows why antisemitism is NEVER EVER about jews or israel, antisemitism is ALWAYS about political power, control and shifting attention from self created problems. Antisemitism is an effective political tool to divert attention from the fact that Islam is a violent, false belief system based on death, suicide, hatred, murder and slavery. It's a lot easier to screech and howl at the jews than to tell your followers that perhaps it's time to clean up our blood soaked house of horrors.

Shi’ite Iran’s Genocidal Jew Hatred

....-the annihilationist threat to Israel posed by a Shi'ite Iranian regime gripped with an apocalyptic, Jew-hating fervor. The pillars of this continuous modern campaign of annihilationist antisemitism are the motifs from traditional Islamic Jew hatred, including, most significantly, Islamic eschatology. These deep-seated Islamic theological motifs are further conjoined to Holocaust denial, and the development of a nuclear weapons program intended expressly for Israel's eradication.

At the outset of the 16th century, Iran's Safavid rulers formally established Shi'a Islam as the state religion, while permitting a clerical hierarchy nearly unlimited control and influence over all aspects of public life. The profound influence of the Shi'ite clerical elite, continued for almost four centuries (although interrupted, between 1722-1795, during a period of [Sunni] Afghan invasion, and internecine struggle), through the later Qajar period (1795-1925), as characterized by the Persianophilic scholar E.G. Browne:

The Mujtahids and Mulla are a great force in Persia and concern themselves with every department of human activity from the minutest detail of personal purification to the largest issues of politics

These Shi'ite clerics emphasized the notion of the ritual uncleanliness (najis) of Jews, in particular (but also Christians, Zoroastrians, and others), as the cornerstone of inter-confessional relationships toward non-Muslims. The impact of this najis conception was already apparent to European visitors to Persia during the reign of the first Safavid Shah, Ismail I (1502-1524). The Portuguese traveler Tome Pires observed (between 1512-1515), "Sheikh Ismail...never spares the life of any Jew," while another European travelogue notes, "...the great hatred (Ismail I) bears against the Jews..."

Monday, July 21, 2008

Sign of fascism: telling the truth about Islam is met with hate and murder

Telling the Truth is Islam-Bashing?

I am bombarded by hate and threats by the Allah-fearing fanatics, simply because I speak the truth about Islam. If telling the truth about Islam is Islam bashing, then mea culpa.

Question: Does Islam get a pass because it is a religion? Who says Islam is a religion? Millions do? What is the evidence? The words of masses of brainwashed carriers of the Islamic virus, transmitted to them by their parents, are worthless as evidence. What counts is the irrefutable fact that this creed, claimed to be the one and only religion of Allah, has been and continues to be a source of great suffering for non-Muslims as well as the ignorant masses of Muslims themselves.

Sign of fascism: telling the truth about Islam is met with suing, hatred, death threats, fascist claims of islamophobia

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Turkey, the only vaguely modern muslim country BRINGS BACK THE HEADSCARF, central to brutalizing and subjugating women

Taken from a long article that reinforces the inescapable conclusion that the entire West should ban all religious headgear in schools, the workplace, any and all public demonstrations, and all government offices.

Religious headgarb can be worn in private, and any and all churches and other religious edifices.

A headdress ban for ALL RELIGIONS will have a domino effect that most dismiss as irrelevant.

Most religious dress is POLITICAL in nature, about power and control, and have nothing whatsoever to do with true spirituality.

The great Martin Luther fought against the superficial trappings of man made political religion, thus opening the doorway (slowly and imperfectly) to creating the greatest civilizations the world has ever seen.

This brilliant article reinforces the idea that the headscarf is CENTRAL to "extremism"

Much of this history is overlooked by the secular elite. Pressed for evidence of creeping Islamisation under the AKP, they point to the growing number of women who wear the headscarf, which is proscribed as a symbol of Islamic militancy in state-run institutions and schools. Mr Erdogan’s attempt to lift the ban for universities, which was later overturned by the constitutional court, is a big part of Mr Yalcinkaya’s case against him and the AKP.

Yet surveys suggest that, except for a small group of militant pro-secularists, most Turks do not oppose Islamic headgear, least of all in universities. Its proliferation probably has little to do with Islamist fervour, but is linked to the influx of rural Anatolians into towns and cities. The exodus from the countryside accelerated under Turgut Ozal, a former prime minister who liberalised the economy in the early 1980s. For conservative families, covering their daughters’ heads became a way of protecting them in a new and alien world.

Once urbanisation is complete the headscarf will begin to fade, says Faruk Birtek, a sociologist at Istanbul’s Bogazici University. Bogazici was always refreshingly unbothered by students with headscarves. But the rules were tightened in the 1990s. And around the time the constitutional court in June overturned the new AKP law to let women with headscarves attend university, Bogazici’s liberal female director was squeezed out.

Saturday, July 19, 2008

How the alarming increase in muslims raping non muslim girls throughout the UK and Europe is tied to not wearing the headscarf


Spencer on rape and jihad


Friday, July 18, 2008

Helpless men protected from the horrors of talking to women. Sexual chaos if women not locked in the house and castrated, illiterate and enslaved?

Clerics warn Yemeni women against getting out of their homes

Sana’a: A group of Yemeni clerics warned women from getting out of their homes. The order, they claim, is to protect society from “vice and sexual chaos”.

The clerics also said that political role for women contradicts Islamic values.

"We warn against opening the door for women, who will get out of their houses and mix with men," the clerics stated in a booklet distributed during a meeting.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Muslim taxidriversin Australia fired for whining about dogs

Company fires them if they object to dogs — unlike the constipated proceedings in the USA



"The burqa is a prison, a straitjacket," state undersecretary for urban policies, Fadela Amara, born in France to Algerian parents who is also a practising Muslim herself, said. In an interview with daily Le Parisien, Amara, former chairwoman of the 'Ni putes ni soumises' ('Neither Prostitutes Nor Subdued') association said she approved of the recent decision of the judicial authorities in Paris which denied French nationality to a Moroccan woman because she was accustomed of wearing an all-covering burqa. To Amara, the ruling of the Council of State enables to "reaffirm the principle of equality between genders". This decision "is a true trampoline for the emancipation and freedom of women" and it can "dissuade certain fanatics from imposing the burqa on their wives", she added. Women that she calls "black crows". The burqa and headscarf to her "are the same thing. It is only a matter of centimetres of fabric". But both "are a sign of the oppression of women. We must fight this obscurantist practice which puts in danger the equality between men and women".

Wednesday, July 16, 2008



The Demise of Islam?

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Abul Kasem, an ex-Muslim who is the author of hundreds of articles and several books on Islam including, Women in Islam. He was a contributor to the book Leaving Islam – Apostates Speak Out as well as to Beyond Jihad: Critical Views From Inside Islam. He writes from Sydney, Australia and can be reached at

FP: Abul Kasem, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Kasem: Good to be here Jamie.

FP: We’re here today to discuss the potential demise of Islam and the fact that the Prophet Muhammad actually predicted this demise himself – a fact that sounds somewhat odd and that many are unaware of. What is the best way to start a discussion of this issue?

Kasem: Well, I would start by asking this question: could the current civilization ever imagine a world without Islam?

To many, this might sound like a dim-witted question. After all, Islam has been with us for fifteen hundred years. It just doesn’t even seem thinkable that Islam could possibly die out. Currently, after all, Islam is the raging storm afflicting every part of the world, especially with the mayhem of the Islamist terrorists and the escalating oil prices – and oil largely flows from a few Islamic lands. The leaders of the un-Islamic world are busy pleasing Islam in whatever manner. Even the United Nation’s Human Rights Organisation has just passed a resolution disallowing discussion of how Islam violates fundamental human rights in many Islamic paradises. In this context, it seems almost impossible to imagine a world free of Islam.

FP: Absolutely, and it is totally unrealistic to think that Islam will ever disappear.

Kasem: No. Despite the world situation that I just painted, what you say is not true at all.

FP: Please explain.

Kasem: We learn from the annals of Islamic history that Islam is not that powerful and that it is actually very vulnerable. Much evidence suggests that it may very well die under its own weight.

FP: Fair enough, please expand.

Kasem: There is a secret life of Islam and it may very well lead to the death of Islam. The history of Islam, for instance, tells us that Islam needs blood to thrive. Human blood is the life-line of Islam, violence its hallmark, and hate its foundation. In the beginning, Islam lives on the blood of infidels. When that is unavailable, or becomes difficult, Islam must cannibalize itself. As a car needs gasoline to run, so does Islam need human blood just to run its own course, set by Muhammad, its Prophet.

FP: Sounds very much like communism. It starts off extinguishing the “class enemy” and then when there are no more external “enemies” to slaughter, the killing machine turns on itself. Terror takes on a life of its own and the killing machine devours its own children and then ultimately engages in suicide. This totalitarian impulse ultimately stems from a death wish.

Kasem: Precisely. And so the demise of Islam is inherent in the very seed of Islamic cannibalism. And so to understand why Islam, eventually, will self-destruct we must first learn a few lessons from the annals of Islamic history. Let me briefly paint the picture:

During the last few decades we have witnessed Islamic cannibalism right, front and center. The most recent event was the Iran-Iraq war, in which millions of Muslims were killed, not by the infidels (kafirs) but by Muslims. Undoubtedly, in not-too-distant a future, we are bound to witness many such events of Islamic cannibalism.

FP: Is Islamic cannibalism theologically rooted?

Kasem: Absolutely. The earliest example of Islamic cannibalism, after all, is found in the Qur’an itself -- in verses 9:108-110. These verses refer to the gutting of a rival mosque on the instruction of Muhammad, when he was returning after his expedition to Tabuk, a resourceful town in the Syrian-Byzantine territory. This Islamic incursion story goes like this:

Proceeding further from Tabuk on his way to Medina, Muhammad halted at Dhu Awan at Quba (about 4 kms. from Medina), an hour’s journey from Medina. There, an opposition Muslim group had built a mosque. Previously, while Muhammad was making preparations for the march to Tabuk, this group of Muslims approached him and said, “O Messenger of God, we have built a mosque for the sick and needy and for rainy and cold nights, and we would like you to visit us and pray for us”(The History of al Tabari, vol.ix, p.61). Busy with his preparations for Tabuk expedition, Muhammad excused himself from visiting this newly-built mosque, but assured the dissident group that he would call on their mosque while returning to Medina (from Tabuk).

On his return journey from Tabuk and halting at Dhu Awan, Muhammad accused builders of this mosque of being unjust. Without any warning, he sent a band of jihadists to burn and destroy the freshly constructed mosque. He said to his band of hooligans, “Go to this mosque whose owners are unjust people and destroy and burn it” (ibid, p.61). His band of raging arsonists stealthily entered the bustling mosque and set fire to it when it was filled with people assembled for the evening prayer. The worshippers dispersed in utter terror. Allah promptly sent down verse 9:107, 110, justifying the destruction of opposition mosques. To further validate his gutting of this mosque, Muhammad concocted the story that he suspected that the builders of the ‘Mosque of Dissent’ were planning to assassinate him.

FP: So what is this story in the Qur’an teaching? What is its message?

Kasem: Those verses of the Qur’an, when taken in true Islamic spirit, can only mean one thing: the call for the devastation of rival mosques. The most important question is: which mosques are genuinely Islamic and which mosques are not so Islamic? Since there is no central authority in Islam to decide on this, it becomes a moot-point. It is, therefore, a free-market in Islam when it comes to destruction and bloodshed.

FP: The consequences?

Kasem: The consequences are obvious and inevitable: Sunnis are free to destroy Shia mosques; the Shias are permitted to destroy Sunni mosques; both these groups are free to destroy Ahmedi or Kurdish mosques, and so on. Within each group there are sub-groups and they are also entitled to commit such atrocities on other groups. This is exactly what is going on in almost all Islamic Paradises.

In Iraq, Sunnis are destroying Shia mosques and murdering them. In Pakistan, Sunnis are killing the Shias and burning their mosques. Then the Shias are avenging this by destroying Sunni mosques. In Bangladesh, both the Sunnis and the Shias are occupying Ahmedi mosques and setting them on fire. This musical chair of mosque-burning and killing is proceeding unabated, each group claiming they are the true Muslims. Each group is adamant they are absolutely following the Qur’an and Sunna (Muhammad’s deeds and examples), the two principal sources of Islam.

Interestingly, this fratricide is unstoppable, as the Islamic Ummah is far from monolithic. No one knows the precise divisions among the Ummah. But Muhammad had predicted that the Muslims will be divided into seventy-two sects, each one killing one another, and together killing the infidels.

FP: So Muhammad actually himself predicted this cannibalism with Islam itself? Give us the theological evidence.

Kasem: Yes he did. There are many ahadith that discuss Muhammad’s prediction about his Ummah. Let me give a few:

Seventy-two of the seventy-three Muslim sects will go to hell; only one of the sects will be in Paradise; it is the majority group…(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 3.40.4580)

Islam has seventy branches…(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 3.40.4659)

Whoever creates disunity in the Islamic community kill him…(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 3.40.4744)

In a note (footnote 4153), the English translator of Sunaan Abu Dawud, Professor Ahmad Hasan admits that it is permissible to ‘cannibalize’ dissident Islamic group/s. He writes: ‘The Prophet (may peace be upon him) did not tolerate disunity and schism among Muslims. Therefore, he ordered that, instead of causing separation and disagreement in the community, it is better to kill the person who causes disunity.’

Another hadis (Sunaan Abu Dawud, 40.4747, Sahih Bukhari, 4.55.577) asks to murder those Muslims who are insincere in their faith. This hadis even tells that Allah loves the Muslims who kill those insincere Muslims.................

Cultural domino linchpin laws badly needed - the joy of amputations just peachy in the UK

Hardline Muslim preacher in the UK calls for 'Islamic-amputation and lashings'

......Muslim preacher in the UK has reportedly called for 'Islamic-like' punishments in the country, suggesting amputation of hands of thieves and lashing those who indulged in unmarried sex.

His demand for 'Islamic-style' punishments was revealed as the row continues over the Lord Chief Justice's recent support for Sharia law, reported The Sun.

Abu Zahra, the Muslim preacher, belongs to hardline Islamic group Hizb Ut Tahrir which once faced a ban. In his sermon at London's Regent's Park mosque last evening, he slated British democracy as criminal, added the paper........

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Islam is front and center not only in slavery and castration but also in genocide of black Africa

An estimated 300,000 black Africans have died in ethnic massacres in Darfur at the hands of Arabic-speaking militias, in what the US has described as genocide. A further 2.5 million refugees have been driven from their homes.

Where's the worldwide muslim leadership? Whining and demagoguing the jews? Is the muslim leadership too busy pulling evil, arrogant shennanigans on our airliners and then suing decent honorable citizens who are scared to death?

Monday, July 14, 2008

MODERATIONIST LAW OF BLAME AMERICA: Blaming America is never ever about America: it's about demagogues demagoguing sheeple for political power


Crybaby alert - BO whines, demagogues, snivels and blames America

Obama: "There has been a shift in Islam that I believe is connected to the failures of governments and the failures of the West to work with many of these countries"
Apparently Obama believes that Islamic jihad is a result of U.S. foreign policy failure. This is an assumption that he shares with virtually everyone of any influence in both parties. They all think that this is a problem that we can make go away by doing something or stopping doing something else. The possibility that it might be a problem that doesn't stem ultimately from our actions and cannot be ended by our actions never seems to occur to anyone.

"CNN exclusive: Obama on foreign policy" -- Fareed Zakaria interviews Barack Obama for CNN, July 13:

ZAKARIA: Do you believe, when looking at the world today, that Islamic extremism is the transcendent challenge of the 21st century?
OBAMA: I think the problems of terrorism and groups that are resisting modernity, whether because of their ethnic identities or religious identities, and the fact that they can be driven into extremist ideologies, is one of the severe threats that we face.

I don't think it's the only threat that we face.

Who does?

ZAKARIA: But how do you view the problem within Islam? As somebody who saw it in Indonesia ... the largest Muslim country in the world?
OBAMA: Well, it was interesting. When I lived in Indonesia -- this would be '67, '68, late '60s, early '70s -- Indonesia was never the same culture as the Arab Middle East. The brand of Islam was always different.

But around the world, there was no -- there was not the sense that Islam was inherently opposed to the West, or inherently opposed to modern life, or inherently opposed to universal traditions like rule of law.

The problem today is not an opposition of "Islam" to the "rule of law." It is the resurgence of the Islamic supremacist ideology that has led to a global attempt to replace non-Muslim legal systems with Islamic sharia law -- an attempt that is making great headway in Europe and is also going on in the United States, both by violence and by stealth.

And now in Indonesia, you see some of those extremist elements. And what's interesting is, you can see some correlation between the economic crash during the Asian financial crisis, where about a third of Indonesia's GDP was wiped out, and the acceleration of these Islamic extremist forces.
I.e., poverty causes Islamic jihad. This is an extremely widespread view, although it has been debunked many times. See, for example, here.

It isn't to say that there is a direct correlation, but what is absolutely true is that there has been a shift in Islam that I believe is connected to the failures of governments and the failures of the West to work with many of these countries, in order to make sure that opportunities are there, that there's bottom-up economic growth.
So the "shift in Islam" doesn't have anything to do -- or anything significant to do -- with imperatives within Islam itself. It is all because of the "failures of the West to work with many of these countries," although we are pouring billions into Egypt and Pakistan and they are still hotbeds of jihadist sentiment.

You know, the way we have to approach, I think, this problem of Islamic extremism ... is we have to hunt down those who would resort to violence to move their agenda, their ideology forward. We should be going after al Qaeda and those networks fiercely and effectively.
But what we also want to do is to shrink the pool of potential recruits. And that involves engaging the Islamic world rather than vilifying it, and making sure that we understand that not only are those in Islam who would resort to violence a tiny fraction of the Islamic world, but that also, the Islamic world itself is diverse.

Wouldn't it also be useful to understand that there is an expansionist and supremacist imperative shared by all orthodox sects and schools of Islam, and that some Muslims will most likely continue to act upon that imperative no matter how much we demonstrate our understanding of Islamic diversity?

And that lumping together Shia extremists with Sunni extremists, assuming that Persian culture is the same as Arab culture, that those kinds of errors in lumping Islam together result in us not only being less effective in hunting down and isolating terrorists, but also in alienating what need to be our long-term allies on a whole host of issues.
Who is really lumping them together? Is anyone really doing that? This is, of course, an accusation that CAIR and co. commonly level against those who speak about the violent and supremacist elements of Islamic theology and law. That Obama would repeat it does not make it appear likely that he will ever come to understand that such violent and supremacist elements actually exist, or formulate a policy that will effectively neutralize them.

ZAKARIA: If U.S. forces in Afghanistan captured Osama bin Laden, what would you do with him, and you were president?
OBAMA: Well, I think that, if he was -- if he was captured alive, then we would make a decision to bring the full weight of not only U.S. justice, but world justice down on him. And I think that -- and I've said this before -- that I am not a cheerleader for the death penalty. I think it has to be reserved for only the most heinous crimes. But I certainly think plotting and engineering the death of 3,000 Americans justifies such an approach.

Now, I think this is a big hypothetical, though. Let's catch him first. And the fact that we have failed to seriously go after al Qaeda over the last five years, because of the distraction of Iraq, I think we are now seeing the consequences of that in Afghanistan.

That's not the only problem we have in Afghanistan. We have not dealt with the narco-trafficking that's taking place there. We have not provided farmers there an option beyond poppy. I think the Karzai government has not gotten out of the bunker and helped organize Afghanistan and government, the judiciary, police forces, in ways that would give people confidence.

So, there are a lot of problems there. But a big chunk of the issue is that we allowed the Taliban and al Qaeda to regenerate itself when we had them on the ropes. That was a big mistake, and it's one I'm going to correct when I'm president.


ZAKARIA: [...] Now, why not support the Clinton plan, which envisions a divided Jerusalem, the Arab half being the capital of a Palestinian state, the Jewish half being the capital of the Jewish state?

OBAMA: You know, the truth is that this was an example where we had some poor phrasing in the speech. And we immediately tried to correct the interpretation that was given.

The point we were simply making was, is that we don't want barbed wire running through Jerusalem, similar to the way it was prior to the '67 war, that it is possible for us to create a Jerusalem that is cohesive and coherent.

I was not trying to predetermine what are essentially final status issues. I think the Clinton formulation provides a starting point for discussions between the parties.

And it is an example of us making sure that we are careful in terms of our syntax. But the intention was never to move away from that basic, core idea that they -- that those parties are going to have to negotiate these issues on their own, with the strong engagement of the United States.

And if you look at the overall tenor of that speech and what I've said historically about this issue, you know, Israel has an interest not just in bunkering down. They've got to recognize that their long-term viability as a Jewish state is going to depend on their ability to create peace with their neighbors.

Their ability?

The Palestinian leadership has to acknowledge that the battles that they've been fighting, and the direction that they've been going in and the rhetoric they've been employing, has not delivered for their people.
Good luck with that. (And is he really characterizing the jihad terror attacks against civilians as "battles"?)

And it is very hard, given the history of that region and the sense of grievance on both sides, to step back and say, let's be practical and figure out what works. But I think that's what the people of Israel and the people in the West Bank and Gaza are desperate for, is just some practical, commonsense approaches that would result in them feeling safe, secure and able to live their lives and educate their children.
Yes, that's what they want in the West Bank and Gaza: safety and security. That's why they elected Hamas.

ZAKARIA: You've also said that the chief beneficiary of the Iraq war has been Iran, which now poses a significant strategic threat to, or challenge to, the United States in the region.
If we were to leave Iraq entirely, would that not cede the field to them and allow Iran to consolidate its gains in the region and in the country?

OBAMA: I don't think so. Look, first of all, I have never talked about leaving the field entirely. What I've said is that we would get our combat troops out of Iraq, that we would not have permanent bases in Iraq.

I've talked about maintaining a residual force there to ensure that al Qaeda does not re-form in Iraq, that we're making sure that we are providing logistical support and potential training to Iraqi forces -- so long as we're not training sectarian armies that are then fighting each other -- to protect our diplomats, to protect humanitarian efforts in the region.

So, nobody's talking about abandoning the field.

ZAKARIA: That might be a large force.

OBAMA: Well, it -- you know, I'm going to make sure that we determine, based on conditions on the ground, how we effectively carry out those limited, temporary missions.

But what is going to prevent Iran from having significant influence inside of Iraq -- or at least, so much influence that Iraq is not functioning -- is to make sure that the government has stood up, that it has capacity, that the Shia, the Sunni, the Kurds have come to the sort of political accommodation that allows them to divide oil revenues that are now coming in quite handsomely, that ensures that, in fact, we're serious about ending corruption in some of the ministries, that provincial federalist approaches to governance are being observed.

The stronger the Iraqi government is on its own -- not with us, but on its own -- the less likely that Iran is going to exert its influence.

And again, this is -- you know this better than I do, Fareed -- the assumption that, because many in Iraq are Shia, that they automatically are going to align themselves with Iran, ignores the fact that you've got Arab and Persian cultures that are very different. And there's -- if Iraqi Shias feel that their government is actually functioning, then I think their identity as Iraqis reasserts itself.

So why did Maliki go to Tehran and pledge friendship and cooperation?

Sunday, July 13, 2008

Instead of whining, suing and crying, the Imams could provide honorable leadership and clean up their blood soaked house

A short note started chain that ended in imams kicked off flight
Story emerging from lawsuit differs from early media reports of '06 case
By David Hanners

Omar Shahin , center, president of the North American Imams Federation listens to a question from the media before going through security as the group of 6 Muslim scholars prepared to fly back to Phoenix on Tuesday, November 21, 2006 at Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport. (Pioneer Press File)Moments after boarding US Airways Flight 300 for Phoenix, Michael McCombie, a 3M sales rep from Santa Clara, Calif., jotted a note and handed it to flight attendant Terri Boatner:

"6 suspicious Arabic men on plane, spaced out in their seats. All were together, saying '... Allah ... Allah ...' cursing U.S. involvement w/Saddaam before flight. 1 in front exit row, another in first row 1st class, another in 8D, another in 22D, two in 25 E & F."

The men in question were six................

Muslims bringing slavery with them from Mohammad's time and CONTINUING INTO THE 21ST CENTURY! WHERE'S LEADERSHIP? COWERING UNDER ROCKS?

Book Review: The Last Patriot

The American prisoners were pushed and shoved through the surging, boisterous crowd that had gathered in the city. As they were paraded towards the palace, they could hear shouts, exclamations of joy, and clapping of hands. They could hear their captors thanking Allah “for their great success and victories over so many Christian dogs, and unbelievers...”

The Americans were paraded before the Muslim leader, who began berating them, saying that he would never make peace with their country, finishing by saying “now I have got you, you Christian dogs, you shall eat stones.”

The forgoing story of American imprisonment sounds as though it may have occurred in present-day Somalia, Iraq, Afganistan, Iran, or Pakistan. But the story is actually taken from an account written by an Amrerican seaman, John Foss, and it tells of his experience with Algerian pirates in 1793. Foss was on the brig Polly out of Newburyport, Massachussetts, bound for Cadiz, Spain when his brig was captured off the coast of Spain.

In 1793, the United States had no navy, and the independence gained just ten years earlier had stripped the fledgling country of the protection of the British navy. And so, the response of the United States Congress in dealing with the Algerian pirates who captured the Polly and who made slaves of American citizens followed the pattern set by European countries: pay a ransom for the release of the prisoners and pay an annual tribute to secure immunity from seizure for American ships. In the fifteen years from 1785 to 1800, Congress made payments of close to $1 million per year to Tripoli, Tunis, Morroco, and Algiers.

The United States agreed to this national extortion while building the navy that would eventually, in 1815, provide the respite from our first taste of Isalmic terrorism (The use of the words “Isalmic Terrorism” are properly considered. By 1800, any seizure of a ship owned by Christians was, by Islamic law, part of jihad against non-believers. For more on this, see Frederic C. Leiner's well-documented book, The End of Barbary Terror). It is interesting to note that, even with the constant threat of Islamic terrorism in the form of the Barbary pirates that faced the Americans in 1793, there were citizens who questioned America's need for a navy, were adverse to the expenditures associated with building the navy, and even went so far as to question the effect that the navy may have on civil liberties. Whether these concerned citizens were the actual founding members of the ACLU could not be confirmed.

In his new novel, The Last Patriot, Brad Thor provides an interesting story that, in a unique way, ties the Islamic terrorists of the late 18th and early 19th century Barbary states to the Islamic terrorists of today. In order to make this unique connection, Thor creates a fictional “lost revelation” of Mohammed. In Thor's fictional account, this final but lost revelation has been puposefully hidden by the terrorists who wish to control the religion of Islam, because it abrogates all of the Qur'an's exhortations to violence and calls upon the adherents of Islam to be peaceful in word and deed.

The connection between the lost revelaton of Islam and the Barbary pirates comes in the person of Thomas Jefferson. Prior to becoming president in 1801, Jefferson also held positions as the United States Minister to France, the Secretary of State, and as Vice-President, and in each of these positions he was called upon to assist in dealing with the terrorism of the Barbary States. Indeed, as Thor recalls in The Last Patriot, in 1786, while Jefferson was Minister to France, he met with the Tripoli ambassador to Great Britain and asked him “by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved American citizens.” The ambassador responded that “the right was founded on the laws of their prophet and that it was written in the Qur'an that all nations that did not acknowledge their authority were sinners, and that it was not only their right and duty to make war upon these sinners wherever they could be found, but to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners.”

They payment of the extortion money to the Barbary States ceased when Thomas Jefferson became the third President of the United States in 1801. Even though Jefferson had previously thought of the navy only as a means of coastal defense, he did not hesitate to send the navy into the Mediterranen when the pasha of Tripoli demanded an immediate payment of $225,000. And so, Thomas Jefferson became the first president to fight Islamic terrorism.

If this book review of a novel that is supposed to be a spy-thriller is beginning to sound as though it is actually a boring history lesson, then you are experiencing the problem that I have with The Last Patriot. Thor makes an attempt at combining an historical novel with a spy-thriller novel and the result is something less than what might be referred to as a “page-turner.” The problem is that the plot is so convoluted – involving historical characters as diverse as Miguel de Cervantes, Thomas Jefferson, Mohammed, Al-Jazari, and two Muslim teens who died prior to the Muslim riots in Paris in 2005 – that Thor fills page after page with historical detail in an effort to fit everything together. This historical detail is usually served up as conversation between the characters in the novel, but it still causes the novel to take on more of a historical lesson quality than one would normally care for in a spy-thriller.

I admire Thor's effort, but I doubt that even the most brilliant and seasoned writer could pull together all of these diverse historical characters without leaving some majors holes in the story. I will not take the time to go into all of these in detail, but I will just note here that Thor never provides a beleivable explanation as to why Jefferson chose to hide the lost revelation, rather than proclaiming it to the world. The novel has a hint of the plot of the movie National Treasure, with those crazy old founding fathers running off and hiding things. One must admit that in National Treasure the plot is downright moronic – the founding fathers hiding millions in treasure when they were in the middle of fighting an expensive war that they could not afford – but the comparison between the movie and book does ring true on the strict event of a founding father mysteriously hiding something that was badly needed.

While concentrating on pulling together all of the loose ends of his plot's historical timeline, Thor loses sight of his characters. There are two instances of Thor's character blindness that I find bothersome. His rogue CIA agent is astoundingly indiscriminate in his killing, both in those he chooses to kill and in those he chooses not to kill. In one instance he makes an effort to kill three people, when he would have been much better served by slipping off into the night, and then later on, he chooses to merely render uncounscious an individual that he should have killed. Additionally, Thor has his protagonist, Scot Harvath, being out-stealthed by a senior pentagon official, and this is totally inconsistent with the character of Harvath as it is developed earlier in the book.

Predictably, the half-wits at the Chicago-Tribune have made the obligatory comparison of Brad Thor to Robert Ludlum, saying “Quite possibly the next coming of Robert Ludlum.” I guess that is true, inasmuch as I, quite possibly, will be the next husband of Christie Brinkley. Thor cannot legitimately be compared to Ludlum at this point, but I do see some promise in his writing. I will purchase his next book, as I believe that there will be improvement. As for The Last Patriot, when it comes out in paperback, you would not be wasting $7.00 if you picked it up to entertain yourself on a long flight. If nothing else, you will get a fairly decent history lesson.


NON MUSLIMS ARE WORSE THAN ANIMALS - an anti assimilation supremicist teaching of islam that must be countered with bloodless laws

Non-Muslims: Worse than Animals

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Abul Kasem, an ex-Muslim who is the author of hundreds of articles and several books on Islam including, Women in Islam. He was a contributor to the book Leaving Islam – Apostates Speak Out as well as to Beyond Jihad: Critical Views From Inside Islam. He writes from Sydney, Australia and can be reached at

FP: Abul Kasem, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Kasem: Thank you.

FP: We are here today to discuss how Islam views non-Muslims. What is the best way to start this discussion?

Kasem: Those who have not read the Qur’an in detail have very little idea about the unremitting hatred Allah has for the non-Muslims. One striking aspect of Islam’s unbound rage and hatred for the unbelievers is that Allah is obsessed with tagging the unbelievers with animals—various types, such as dogs, camels, cows, pigs, apes, goat and so on.

FP: Can you share some verses from the Qur’an, ahadith, and other important sources in Islam on this theme?

Kasem: Sure. Allah sees unbelievers as worse than animals. Let us start with verse 8:55 of the Qur’an. In essence this verse says: the unbelievers are the worst beasts (or worst animals) in the eyes of Allah. much more of the same.............

Saturday, July 12, 2008

why laws against polygamy are essential to assimilation and are a key step into freedom for the brutalized subjugated women of islam

why laws against polygamy are essential to assimilation and are a key step into freedom for the brutalized subjugated women of islam

Polygamous societies are full of subnormal inbreds


Middle East families shed light on autism genes

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Research on large Middle Eastern families has helped scientists pinpoint six new genes implicated in autism, a new study published Thursday said.


The Homozygosity Mapping Collaborative for Autism recruited 104 families from across the Arabic Middle East, Turkey and Pakistan, in which there was a high incidence of autism; 88 of the families included cousin marriages.

Friday, July 11, 2008

Forcibly raped by father in law, mullahs call for annulment of her marriage!


Muslim clerics annul rape victim's marriage

LUCKNOW: In a chilling reminder of the Imrana case, yet another young woman from Muzaffarnagar who allegedly fell victim to her father-in-law’s sexual assault faces a bleak future after mullahs called for the annulment of her marriage.

On July 6, Salma (25), an unlettered mother of two kids, returned to her parental home in Islamnagar, Muzaffarnagar, after she was allegedly raped by her father-in-law over a period of six months. Salma’s father, Raisuddin, filed a criminal complaint with the police under section 376-506 IPC in Ghaziabad, and the accused, Salma's father-in-law Akbar, has been jailed.

But in the process her four-year-old marriage to Azad has virtually ended after clerics ruled their reunion as 'haraam'.

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Evil slavery cult dad butchers daughter and then claims he did nothing wrong according to islam!

Georgia honor killer says he did nothing wrong, demands Islamic food in prison

No pork, please

Contrary to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution headline, he didn't actually say he was innocent. He said he had done nothing wrong. That's not the same thing. According to an earlier story on this case, he confessed to killing his daughter, and explained that he had done it to cleanse his family's honor. When he appeared before the judge, it is unlikely that he changed this story. He just said he didn't do anything wrong. And by the lights of the Islamic culture from which he comes, which thinks that a father killing a daughter who has sullied his family's honor is perfectly justified, he indeed hasn't done anything wrong.

Wednesday, July 09, 2008

A great book. Since Mohammad was enslaving and butchering jews, islam has spread by slavery and butchery of any and all who get in it's way

The Last Patriot: A Thriller (Hardcover)
by Brad Thor (Author)

Brad Thor, master of suspense and New York Times bestselling author of The First Commandment, returns with his highest-voltage thriller to date. In a pulse-pounding, adrenaline-charged tour de force, Navy SEAL turned covert Homeland Security operative Scot Harvath must race to locate an ancient secret that has the power to stop militant Islam dead in its tracks.
June 632 A.D.: Deep within the Uranah Valley of Mount Arafat in Mecca, the Prophet Mohammed shares with his closest companions a final and startling revelation. Within days, he is assassinated.

September 1789: U.S. Minister to France Thomas Jefferson, who is charged with forging a truce with the violent Muslim pirates of the Barbary Coast, makes a shocking discovery - one that could forever impact the world's relationship with Islam.

Present day: When a car bomb explodes outside a Parisian café, Scot Harvath is thrust back into the life he has tried so desperately to leave behind.

Saving the intended victim of the attack, Harvath becomes party to an amazing and perilous race to uncover a secret so powerful that militant Islam could be defeated once and for all without firing another shot, dropping another bomb, or launching another covert action.

But as desperate as the American government is to have the information brought to light, there are powerful forces aligned against it - men who are just as determined that Mohammed's mysterious final revelation continue to remain hidden forever.

What Jason Bourne was to the Cold War, Scot Harvath is to the War on Terror. Brad Thor has created "the perfect all-American hero for the post September 11 world" (Nelson DeMille) and will keep readers glued to the pages as he once again takes them across the globe on a heart-pounding chase where the stakes are higher than they have ever been before.

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

Wherever islam goes, mistreatment of women follows

Rise of Islamic extremism erodes women's rights

SULAIMANIYAH, Iraq | Four gunshots through the kitchen window. Two to the leg, one to the stomach, one to the head. The woman, who will remain unnamed for her safety, survived the attack, but she is still in hiding.

"For seven years, it was a secret place for housing women," said Kazhal Ali, the administrator of Asuda, a nongovernmental organization (NGO) in northeastern Iraq that runs shelters for abused women, including the one who was attacked.

"Now it is discovered," Ms. Ali said, "and we changed the shelter to another place."

ASSOCIATED PRESS SHARIAH LAW: A woman sifting through trash at a garbage dump in Baghdad's Shi'ite stronghold of Sadr City wears a head scarf and veil. Women in Iraq are under more pressure to conform to Islamic traditions that strictly limit their rights and opportunities.

The wounded woman's brother, husband and two brothers-in-law have since been arrested - by police officers who only recently began investigating and charging those accused of attacking women.

The Kurdistan Regional Government's Interior Ministry has given officials the authority to ensure that cases of violence against women are processed.

But the male-dominant culture remains in Iraq, even in the semiautonomous northern Kurdish region and even though Iraqis no longer face the brutality of Saddam Hussein's government.

Life after Saddam has proved a mixed blessing for many women, who face religious extremism in a nation once considered among the Middle East's most progressive for women's rights.

"Throughout the country, women reported increasing pressure to wear veils, including within government ministries," according to the U.S. State Department's latest report on human rights in Iraq.

"Women were targeted for undertaking normal activities, such as driving a car, and wearing trousers, in an effort to force them to remain at home, wear veils and adhere to a conservative interpretation of Islam," the report says.

Monday, July 07, 2008

Evidentally the muslim idea of human rights is their right to take humans as slaves!

A lesson for muslims on how to treat all, not just a few (why the Christian golden rule creates the most successful societies in the world)

A lady in a faded gingham dress and her husband, dressed in a

homespun threadbare suit, stepped off the train in Boston , and walked

timidly without an appointment into the Harvard University President's

outer office.

The secretary could tell in a moment that such backwoods, country

hicks had no business at Harvard & probably didn't even deserve to be

in Cambridge . 'We'd like to see the president,' the man said softly.

'He will be busy all day,' the secretary snapped. 'We will wait,' the lady


For hours the secretary ignored them, hoping that the couple would

finally become discouraged and go away. They didn't, and the secretary

grew frustrated and finally decided to disturb the president, even though it

was a chore she always regretted.

'Maybe if you see them for a few minutes, they'll leave,' she said

to him! He sighed in exasperation and nodded. Someone of his importance

obviously didn't have the time to spend with them, and he detested

gingham dresses and homespun suits cluttering up his outer office.

The president, stern faced and with dignity, strutted toward the couple.

The lady told him , 'We had a son who attended Harvard for one

year. He loved Harvard. He was happy here. But about a year ago, he was

accidentally killed. My husband and I would like to erect a memorial to

him, somewhere on campus.' The president wasn't touched. He was shocked.

'Madam,' he said, gruffly, 'we can't put up a statue for every person that

Harvard and died.. If we did, this place would look like a cemetery.'

'Oh, no,' the lady explained quickly. 'We don't want to

erect a statue. We thought we would like to give a building to Harvard.'

The president rolled his eyes. He glanced at the gingham dress and homespun

suit, then exclaimed, 'A build ing! Do you have any earthly idea how

much a building costs? We have over seven and a half million dollars in the

physical buildings here at Harvard.'

For a moment the lady was silent.

The president was pleased. Maybe he could get rid of them now.

The lady turned to her husband and said quietly, 'Is that all it cost

to start a university? Why don't we just start our own? ' Her husband

nodded. The president's face wilted in confusion and bewilderment.

Mr. and Mrs. Leland Stanford got up and walked away, traveling to

Palo Alto, California where they established the university that bears their

name, Stanford University , a memorial to a son that Harvard no

longer cared about.

You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who

they think can do nothing for them.

A TRUE STORY By Malcolm Forbes

Slavery is alive and well in islam: forced marriage amounts to forced rape - then murdered by dear old dad

Police: Arranged marriage led father to kill daughter

A Clayton County man faces murder charges in the strangulation death of his 25-year-old daughter early Sunday over what police said was her desire to end an arranged marriage.

Chaudhry Rashad, 54, apparently became angry during an argument in which the victim, Sandela Kanwal, told him she wanted out of the marriage, Clayton police spokesman Timothy Owens said.

Appease and excuse barbarism, always always begets more barbarism

Why is perfection demanded from Israel?

Perfection demanded from America?

Perfection demanded from Republicans and/or Conservatives?

Slavery, genocide, castration, dishonor murders, suicideforsexwiththedead and barbarism just fine in the world of islam?

Liberals/democrats can ignore laws?

Liberals/democrats can be as degenerate as they please?


Much of the world has disparaged Israel's celebration of its 60th year of independence (renewed independence, actually) by claiming, as one Connecticut newspaper columnist did the other day, that the country "was built over the debris of 400 destroyed villages and the sorrows of 750,000 people, both Christians and Muslims, expelled from their land."

Yes, Israel's re-establishment in 1948 had its dislocations, Jews going here, Muslims going there, and Christians caught in the middle. But not all these dislocations were expulsions. And if the whole Middle East is counted, there have been far more expulsions of Jews than of anyone else. In any case complaints about the dislocations in Israel's re-establishment presume that the planet was delivered to humanity straight from the factory with its national borders already marked on it and that the return of Israel was a smudge on the natural order of things. In fact, of course, most of today's national borders were established either by war or colonialism. Some make sense now; many still don't.

Even though its re-establishment in 1948 involved war, Israel can claim far more legitimacy than most countries. For unlike most countries today Israel was re-established by resolution of the international organization, the United Nations. Israel's neighbors refused to accept the U.N. resolution and immediately went to war against the new country, and then twice more, in 1967 and 1973, always to deny Israel's legitimacy. But unlike most nations victorious in war, Israel has either given back or has been looking for safe ways of giving away most of the territory it conquered.

As much as the dislocations arising from Israel's re-establishment obsess certain people today, they are tiny compared to dislocations that are hardly noticed anymore. For example, just a year before Israel's re-establishment, British-ruled India was partitioned, by act of Parliament and consensus among the colony's political classes, into Hindu and Muslim sectors, the former becoming independent India and the latter becoming Pakistan. This partition uprooted about 15 million people and cost about a half million lives, through ethnic violence, expropriation, and exhaustion. The resentments arising from the partition of India endure today and continue to cost as many lives every year as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict does, but no one outside India and Pakistan seems to care.

Of course Europe, where criticism of Israel's anniversary may be strongest, has partitioned itself too many times to count, with peoples and nations pushed north, south, east, and west over the centuries. From Finland down to Yugoslavia –– whoops, Serbia now –– it is impossible to walk more than a few miles without crossing what, within the last 200 years, used to be a national border or without finding a town whose name wasn't different not long ago.

Anyone aggrieved that the areas that are supposed to become the Palestinian homeland –– the West Bank and Gaza –– are separated by 20 miles of Israel might check the map of the Indian subcontinent, where 1,500 miles separate what used to be the two Pakistans (now Pakistan and Bangladesh), or the map of Europe, where Russia's Kaliningrad province is 300 miles from Russia proper, cut off by Lithuania and Latvia.

While Israel, the size of Connecticut, is supposed to return to Syria the Golan Heights, smaller than Rhode Island, China is keeping the vastness of Tibet, which it seized in 1959. And, having made five states out of the territory it seized by war in 1848, the United States won't be returning Alta California to Mexico any time soon.

Traces of vanished, persecuted, dispersed, and murdered aboriginal peoples can be found in practically every country –– that's what Connecticut's Indian casinos are supposed to be about –– but everyone is forgiven except for the Jews, who instead are constantly ducking rocket fire and curses for clinging to their tiny strip along the eastern Mediterranean. Call it tribalism if you want, but that is to be blind to the tribalism that surrounds Israel, a tribalism that, unlike any Israeli tribalism, preaches extinction.

That Connecticut newspaper columnist approvingly quoted a letter written by a hundred anti-Israel British Jews denouncing the country's anniversary: "We will celebrate when Arabs and Jews live as equals in a peaceful Middle East." Of course such equality is to be attempted first not by democratizing Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, or Iran but by erasing the border that protects the smallest tribe so that it falls under the sovereignty of the very nations that drove it out and then three times waged war against it.

Free Site Counter